d***@hotmail.com
2007-04-27 00:15:31 UTC
Hi,
I'm currently restoring a Finnigan MAT GCQ with Finnigan GC back to
service. I'm using 99.999% helium bought from Praxaix as carrier gas
for the GC and as damping/vent gas in the MS. The air/water mass spec
looks sort of OK. The peak for H2O+, N2+ and O2+ are all well over
20%
of the H3O+ peak, but I'm concerned about a high ion (TIC) count in
the air/water spectrum. Praxair says their 99.999% helium contains
less than 2 ppm of water but I think there should be well under 1 ppm
water for sensitivity. I'm sure the helium we have is more than
adequate as damping/vent gas in the MS. My question is what are the
best suppliers of GC/MS quality hydrogen as carrier gas and MS
quality
methane as CI gas? Price is a consideration.
My second question is related to the use of taps. We've priced out a
triple purpose water/oxygen/hydrocarbon which is less expensive than
the price differential between 99.999% helium and the best research
quality helium from Praxair. However, traps can create clutter and
other problems. What is the current wisdom concerning the use of
traps? Can we get GC/MS quality hydrogen and methane and avoid the
use
of traps and do so economically over time? The triple purpose trap is
rated for two years use.
d.
I'm currently restoring a Finnigan MAT GCQ with Finnigan GC back to
service. I'm using 99.999% helium bought from Praxaix as carrier gas
for the GC and as damping/vent gas in the MS. The air/water mass spec
looks sort of OK. The peak for H2O+, N2+ and O2+ are all well over
20%
of the H3O+ peak, but I'm concerned about a high ion (TIC) count in
the air/water spectrum. Praxair says their 99.999% helium contains
less than 2 ppm of water but I think there should be well under 1 ppm
water for sensitivity. I'm sure the helium we have is more than
adequate as damping/vent gas in the MS. My question is what are the
best suppliers of GC/MS quality hydrogen as carrier gas and MS
quality
methane as CI gas? Price is a consideration.
My second question is related to the use of taps. We've priced out a
triple purpose water/oxygen/hydrocarbon which is less expensive than
the price differential between 99.999% helium and the best research
quality helium from Praxair. However, traps can create clutter and
other problems. What is the current wisdom concerning the use of
traps? Can we get GC/MS quality hydrogen and methane and avoid the
use
of traps and do so economically over time? The triple purpose trap is
rated for two years use.
d.