Ionization energy, work function and absurdity of modern science

[sorin]

Ionization energy, work function and absurdity of modern
science

The neglected ionization energy variation for isoelectronic series
can
reveal more useful information about electrons structure; the problem
is these data are in contradiction with actual quantum theory.
The quantum prediction for work functions values are in contradiction
with experiments; for metals, ionization energy and work function
must
be equal but in reality they are not.
For other classes of compounds quantum mechanic fails again to
predict
something. A striking example is the case of metallic oxides having
work functions values smaller then metals. It is outrageous how a
covalent or ionic bound liberate electrons easier then a metallic
bound in frame of actual physics.

The improved link:
http://www.elkadot.com/chemistry/Ionization%20energy%20and%20work%20function.htm

Regards
Sorin Cosofret

[Autymn D. C.]

The neglected ionization energy variation for isoelectronic series can
reveal more useful information about electrons structure; the problem is
these data are in contradiction with actual quantum theory.
The quantum prediction for work functions values are in contradiction
with experiments; for metals, ionization energy and work function must be
equal but in reality they are not.

That is your prediction, shit-head cretin liar, not QM's. Work
function on room-temperature solid elements is smaller than the atomic
state due to a shallower charge weall.

For other classes of compounds quantum mechanic fails again to predict
something. A striking example is the case of metallic oxides
having work functions values smaller then metals. It is outrageous
how a covalent or ionic bound liberate electrons easier then a metallic >bound in frame of actual physics.

bond, retard
It does not and is not, nor did you ever use quantum mekanics to
predict anything. This is elèctrokemics and elementary maths, which
you fail again. Thorium has four valent charges, whereas thoria has
16 from the oxygen atoms; therefore whatever enthalpy the latter
contribute is overwhelmed by the extra charges. Work function is a
specific enthalpy rather than molar.

-Aut

[JJ beans]

The most important aspect of quantum mechanics that is universally
stressd on day one and 2 of any good physical chemistry calss is it is
completely derived. It is a good to very good model. The example of
the failures of quatum mechanics to explain reality are numerous. The
limiitations are evident in week one classes - the only exact
solutions to, again derived models (and very cool stuff) is the
hydrogen atom - a two body problem. Many time VSEPR and the like are
the better tools in the kit. We have a ways to go and Qunatum
mechanics has helped.
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:08:07 -0700 (PDT), sorin

Post by sorin
Ionization energy, work function and absurdity of modern
science
The neglected ionization energy variation for isoelectronic series
can
reveal more useful information about electrons structure; the problem
is these data are in contradiction with actual quantum theory.
The quantum prediction for work functions values are in contradiction
with experiments; for metals, ionization energy and work function
must
be equal but in reality they are not.
For other classes of compounds quantum mechanic fails again to
predict
something. A striking example is the case of metallic oxides having
work functions values smaller then metals. It is outrageous how a
covalent or ionic bound liberate electrons easier then a metallic
bound in frame of actual physics.
http://www.elkadot.com/chemistry/Ionization%20energy%20and%20work%20function.htm
Regards
Sorin Cosofret